What about the Galiano case casino uniform

An analysis of the reported decisions on copyright law reveals that: (i) validity of The Copyright Actor of any provisions of the Act was not in question in any of the decisions (ii) constitutional validity of Rule 29 (4) of The Copyright Rules, 2013 was in question in one of the decisions in which the Supreme Court showing deference to the legislative wisdom reversed the decision of the High Court on the ground that the High Court has overreached its remit and has re-drafted the rule (iii) both Labour and Utilitarian Theories, and not any other theory, have been simultaneously invoked by the Supreme Court and (iv) on an average, the Court has decided 1.66 copyright cases in a year or one copyright case in 251 days, or in.

This Paper seeks to build upon the method and findings of ‘Theoretical Underpinnings of Copyright and Design Laws: Decisions of the Supreme Court of India’ with a view to examine the theoretical underpinnings of copyright law post-Krishika Lulla and design law post-Godrej Sara Lee as discovered or constructed in the decisions of the Supreme Court of India (Supreme Court).

What about the Galiano case casino uniform